As you no doubt have heard, spineless Harry Reid has decided it’s more politically expedient to oppose the building of an Islamic mosque and community center in the old Burlington Coat Factory building in New York City (BTW, for those of us unfamiliar with the area, TPM has pictures of the neighborhood; I must say, for the most part, it looks like a shithole) than it is to defend the US Constitution and the right it grants “we the people” – be they Catholic, Protestant, Muslim, Moonie, or Hindu – to worship (or not) as they see fit (short of human sacrifice or something) without government interference. Whether or not this helps old Harry get reelected, it’s precisely this sort of behavior that has control of Congress on the verge of flipping to Republicans.
Democrats, on the whole, don’t appear to actually stand for much of anything and, given the fact that they appear to be no different than Republicans, aren’t likely to win the seats that are actually in play. All else being equal, boot out the party that’s in power. It’s a shame, really, since – much as the Democrats disgust me – I honestly think having Republicans in charge will be way worse in every way imaginable. Obama looks to be a one-and-done at this point (way too early to call, of course; if the economy and unemployment turn around or things stop looking like such a quagmire in Afghanistan, maybe he can limp to a ineffective second term).
Of course, Obama “stood up” for the rights of citizens to build whatever they want on private property (and good for him), but then of course he had to couch his remarks in a rather Clintonesque way the next day by saying, “hey, oh, wait a minute. They have a right to build there, but I think it’s wrong to actually do it.”
I know, I know. It’s very nuanced. Like saying you defend the right of Nazis to march through downtown Poughkeepsie, but you hate the message they’re sending. OK, I get that, I guess, though I don’t get what’s wrong with building a community center/mosque, and I don’t get why Obama can never just come out and be on the correct side of an issue without trying to have it both ways.
Why not just say, “look, do you want the government or ‘majority rule’ to deny you the right to build your church in a particular location, just because it happens to fall out of favor with the unwashed masses? Should we deny the right of Christians to build churches and assemble freely because Fred Phelps is an asshole and his church is a perversion of Christianity? Should we refuse to allow a Catholic Church to open within a mile of a school because it’s a ‘slap in the face’ to kids and their families who have suffered abuse by priests?”
Yeah, you’re right. It wouldn’t make any difference to these mouth-breathing idiots. But it would make a difference to me.
Then again, nobody’s asking me.
If I am a little thankful for the crumbs, which seems to be what they want, does that make me part of the semi-pro left? I think I will start with the pick up softball left.
Should I hope for a Reid win and hope to see him stripped of Majority Leader should that still be a question? Who’s to replace him? Should I hope for the wacky-doodle to defeat him and embarrass and expose herself and her ilk for the run up to 2012?
Really, who’s to be the repug in 2012? Mittens? Sarah? Pawlenty? Jindal? (She turned me into a) NEWT!? Whitman?
Personally, I’ve always found hope to be pretty ineffective (otherwise, I’d have won the lottery a long time ago). So, if your gonna hope, I’d say you might as well go ahead and hope that a surge of progressive independents run for and win every open seat in both the House and the Senate in November, paving the way for a true liberal to take the White House in 2012, and giving him or her a legislative majority that will enable them to enact a progressive agenda that will put this country on the right (so to speak) track.
If you’re gonna hope, hope big.
That would be a big “H” since I haven’t seen any huge surge of prog indies on the landscape for this election. Nuttin’ but teabags.
How about Hoping that the teabaggers are stealth libruls, trying to sneak in under the radar in order to take office and unleash their godless agenda of equal rights, universal health care, helping the least among us, and religious tolerance.
Someone needs to check their meds.
sigh…
any improvement is good.
sort of the zen approach to political hope
Bobby Thompson, a sad passing. Well played!
:yippee: :banana: 🙁 :gate:
NYC transportation planners released a report on traffic accidents involving pedestrians on Manhattan streets:
cabs, along with buses and trucks, accounted for far fewer pedestrian accidents in Manhattan than did private automobiles. Jaywalkers were involved in fewer collisions than their law-abiding counterparts who waited for the “walk†sign, though they were likelier to be killed or seriously hurt by the collision.
And in 80 percent of city accidents that resulted in a pedestrian’s death or serious injury, a male driver was behind the wheel. (Fifty-seven percent of New York City vehicles are registered to men.)
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/08/17/nyregion/17walk.html?_r=1&ref=todayspaper
I am so disgusted by this “ground zero mosque” crap. It is scary too.
Is it worse because it is neither a mosque nor at ground zero? Does the porn store on the same block merit the title “Ground Zero Porn shop?” Why is a porn shop less offensive than a Muslim community center? Has the right wing given up on sexual mores?
I think Cenk has given the most well-reasoned, while at the same time, impassioned argument for what religious freedom in amerika should stand for.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lzp5sKG0NX0
Kinda wanna see the new series Raising Hope
“My knight in shining armor turned out to be a retard wrapped in tin foil.”
Hilarious