I’ve been giving a lot of thought to those poor parental units out there, faced with school closings and class size increases and all that. So I’ve come up with what I’m calling the “Responsible Breeding Act of 2012.” It is, if I do say so myself, a rather elegant solution. My only regret is not having it prepared in time for Gabby Giffords to introduce it on her last day in office (which I’m pretty certain would have ensured enactment).
There are a couple of facets to this legislation that are required to make it work. First, there’s a little bit of tax relief for those people who don’t actually have kids in public school. If you have a kid in school, you have to pay $500 per year per kid for every year your kid goes to public school. That money will be pooled and distributed evenly to all households that pay school taxes (maximum household income limits for rebates, and corporations are not eligible), but don’t actually have kids in school.
Of course, that, in and of itself, isn’t really viable. What with the cost of getting a kid started being pretty cheap, lots of people that have kids won’t have the bucks to pony up for the school fee (never mind money for books, food, clothes, etc.). That’s where the real meat and potatoes (or, rather, eggs and mayonnaise) of the RBA come in.
All adolescent males will need to provide sperm (they’re doing it anyway, so we – and by “we” I mean somebody other than “me” – might as well collect it). This will be frozen, tested for viability, healthiness, etc., and securely stored. Once there is a sufficient supply (I figure a gallon ought to do it; should take the average 13-yr old about six weeks), the males will be sterilized.
Oh, I know, that sounds harsh. But think about it. Teen pregnancy will be reduced to near zero, abortions will be extraordinarily rare, and the “deadbeat dad” problem will be all but eliminated. Frankly, guys can’t relied upon to be responsible and shouldn’t be trusted with live ammunition.
Now, in order to pay for sperm collection, storage, and eventual insemination, people desiring to procreate will need to obtain a breeding permit. There’ll be an application process requiring prospective breeders to prove financial stability and fitness to parent (perhaps take some classes), and would also require a background check and mental screening. This won’t totally prevent unstable or abusive people from becoming parents, but it should help.
In addition to the basic permit fee, prospective breeders will be required to provide a deposit equivalent to five years worth of school fees. This deposit will be returned if the child dies or is otherwise unable to attend public school, and will also be returned if the kid graduates from school on time (refund reduced for each year held back). Oh, and every kid has to get a puppy (kitties optional, but encouraged) from the shelter by their fourth birthday at the latest.
So, there you have it. A solution for unwanted pregnancy, overpopulation, overcrowded schools, teen pregnancy, and abortion. Incentive for parents to stay involved in their kids’ school work and see to it they graduate on time. Tax relief. Reduction of the human carbon footprint. Rampant fornication without consequences (well, other than STDs and whatnot). And puppies.
Everybody wins. :pup:
Oh, I know what you’re thinking. This plan favors the wealthy and discriminates against the poor. And I say, yes, you’re right, it does. I don’t know if you’ve looked around out there, but life favors the wealthy and discriminates against the poor. Bummer, but that’s how it goes.
I also readily admit that if this plan had been in place 50+ years ago, I wouldn’t be here right now. I think, somehow, the world would have survived.
Also, this plan puts all the onus on the male of the species, in terms of not reproducing. Again, that’s correct. While I admit that it takes two to tango, only one gets the option to walk away when the music stops. And that’s the one that need to take some responsibility upfront, ‘cuz we can’t trust him to do it after the fact.
Excellent plan, PJ. Beats the one the my teacher friends and I had devised. We thought everyone got to have the first kid, but after that a committee of that kid’s teachers determined if the parents had done a good enough job to have a second. However, you fail to provide for a supply of flavor enhancing fetuses.
Newt Gingrich better hope voters who lapped up his delicious hits on the “elite media†and liberals don’t read the Drudge Report this morning.
Or the National Review. Or the American Spectator. Or Ann Coulter.
If they do, Gingrich comes off looking like a dangerous, anti-Reagan, Clintonian fraud.
snip
• The overnight Drudge Report banner: “Insider: Gingrich repeatedly Insulted Reagan.†The headline linked to a devastating takedown by Elliott Abrams in the National Review, who wrote, among other things, that Gingrich had a long record of criticizing and undermining Reagan’s most transformative policies.
snip
• Ann Coulter, the conservative columnist writing on her self-titled website, warns: “Re-elect Obama, Vote Newt!†She, too, gets Drudge promotion, with a column punctuated with this punch: “Hotheaded arrogance is neither conservative nor attractive to voters.â€
• Tom DeLay, a top deputy to Gingrich during the Republican revolution of the mid-1990s, joined the chorus of other conservative members breaking their silence about Gingrich’s erratic leadership style.
snip
A top conservative media figure said the flood of attacks reflects a “Holy crap, it could happen†moment in the movement, as Republican leaders began to realize after Gingrich’s South Carolina victory that he could become the nominee, the global face and voice of their party and theology.
http://dyn.politico.com/printstory.cfm?uuid=27E55C6E-46A9-4338-A11D-619F63B627B5
That will give Newt plenty of new cannon fodder and enemies to attack in tonight’s debate which I know everyone will be watching. Luntz must be furiously focus grouping his fat ass off trying to come up with the simple phrase for the simpleminded to pin on these dastards who deign to criticize Der Newt. Pseudo-conservanazi elite guard. Too many syllables. So many adjectives and pejoratives, so little time and such little minds.
I dunno, pj, I like how you take care of the puppies (kitties too, albeit half-ass), but I think you’d increase the size of govmint. (It’s rather intriguing to wonder how men would like their reproductive organs regulated for a change.) Ron Paul is telling me right now that government is vewy vewy bad …(Except if we need to build a fence on the border, control women’s bodies, and issue gold for his gold standard….)
Alas, I wouldn’t be here either (a New Year’s party) and neither would our wonderful children. Plus, if you live in a good school district, your house value is increased, no?