Yesterday was officially payday for me, and thanks to direct deposit I saw that the 2% hike in the payroll tax is already in effect (it’s a shame payday couldn’t have been on 12/31). So if you’re making $110,100 a year in salary, you’ll be paying $2,202 more a year. And if you’re making $500,000 a year, you’ll be paying $2,202 more a year (or about .04% more). And if you’re making all your money in capital gains or investments, you’ll be paying $0 more. Seems fair, doesn’t it?
Republicans are now saying that they’ve “taken care” of the revenue side of things, and now it’s time to cut spending (in fact, according to the CBO, rather than cut the deficit, this bill will add $4 trillion in debt over the next 10 years). So we’ll see what they come up with to cut. I doubt it’ll be military spending, and there’s really not a whole lot left to cut after that. Except for Medicare/Medicaid and Social Security, of course. Medicare and Medicaid account for about 23% of the budget, Social Security 20%, and Defense is about 19%. Assuming we’ll never seem them raise the cap on the payroll tax (which would be a pretty easy fix for Social Security, in my opinion), I don’t see them doing anything more than making deep cuts. Whether that means cutting benefits, raising the eligibility age, or both, we’ll have to see. Medicaid will probably get big cuts, because nobody cares what poor people think (and it just makes things harder for the non-profit hospitals that have no choice but to treat the indigent and swallow the costs).
Oh well, I guess we’ll see what happens.
I haven’t heard all of the details but I think BHO actually spined up a little more than in the past. I also think the House teapugs will be even more marginalized when the page turns. It will be interesting to see if de-Boehner keeps his job. My guess is he will. I think young gun Ryan voting for the deal might point to that. Of course, he’ll be the one ‘gunning’ for the above mentioned ‘entitlements’.
:fu:
Look at it this way, the 2% isn’t a tax since it goes in to Social Security. It’s an investment contribution. I understand it still won’t buy you groceries today, but it isn’t just a blanket tax. As one who helps folks access their paid contributions, I do like seeing it being funded. Can’t stand Social Security being called an entitlement program. :fu: teapugs
Not only that, they need to pay back the raid on the Social Security trust fund and when they raise the ceiling on collection there will be no solvency issues.
I swear I heard Ms. Alan Greenspan say a little while ago that the middle class people earning between $250K-$450K had been spared a tax increase. Not sure I will waste any time recovering that gem.
Well, it’s a tax, ‘cuz it’s a tax. And while, in theory, it’s supposed to go into a trust fund to pay for future benefits, there’s actually no guarantee that the money won’t be diverted somewhere else (because Al Gore didn’t get elected and put it into that “lock box” that everybody made fun of him over).
I don’t mind paying the 2%, but it doesn’t mean that they won’t raise the age for which I’m eligible, and it doesn’t mean they won’t reduce benefits.
They could easily strengthen SS by not limiting the amount of income on which it’s paid. Or at least raising it.
As it is, going back the 4.2% contribution is regressive and takes money out of the economy by hurting those who make the least. A family of four making $23,000 a year will pay an extra $40 a month. That could be the choice between food and medicine.
As usual, you are correct, sir.
It is regressive. That was part of my point that the ceiling should be lifted maybe right up to the point so that it covers all of those “middle” classers up to $400K and maybe beyond. Honestly, I thought all of the Bush tax cuts should have been allowed to lapse as well as the payroll tax relief and then the tax system reformed. I’m not talking about that flat tax BS or national sales tax or VAT which are all very regressive. I mean the things in the tax code that nobody making under $100K can use anyway. I don’t mean things like the mortgage deductions for primary homes of reasonable value.
What will probably happen is that they will end up stripping out all of little breaks that trickle down to the pee-ons and never get to the things the fabulously wealthy and corporate personhood have to manipulate and utilize to avoid paying their fair share.
I agree!
Vern, did you see that Patti Page passed away ? :gate: 🙁
Oh, just saw you fb post….. Nice song choice.
🙁 :gate:
Ray Collins dies; singer with the Mothers of Invention was 75
Collins, who was steeped in doo-wop and pachuco, was critical to the band’s early sound. He fired the group’s first guitarist and replaced him with Frank Zappa. Collins left the band in 1968.
:blues: 🙁 :gate:
My favorite part of Christi’s tirade:
“Finally, New York and New Jersey are perennially among the most generous states in the nation to our fellow states. We vote for disaster relief for other states in need. We are donor states, sending much more to Washington, DC than we ever get back in federal spending. Despite this history of unbridled generosity, in our hour of desperate need we’ve been left waiting for help six times longer than the victims of Katrina, with no end in sight.
Looking Forward
By GAIL COLLINS
Right now you are probably asking yourself: Will the new Congress being sworn in this week work any better than the last one?
There’s always a chance. Because, you know, it’s new. Also, the bar is low, since some people believe the departing 112th Congress was the worst in history, because of its stupendous lack of productivity and a favorability rating that once polled lower than the idea of a Communist takeover of America.
On the very last day the Republican-led House of Representatives was in session, the Republican governor of New Jersey, Chris Christie, announced it was “why the American people hate Congress.†This was after Speaker John Boehner failed to bring up a bill providing aid to the victims of the megastorm Sandy. Disaster relief joined a long list of bills that the 112th Congress could not get its act together to approve, along with reforming the farm subsidies and rescuing the Postal Service. Those particular pieces of legislation were all written and passed by the Senate, a group that’s generally less proactive than a mummy.
Ah, the House. To be fair, it takes a lot of effort to vote to repeal Obamacare 33 times.
Our outgoing lawmakers did retrieve us from that “fiscal cliff.†Although they were the ones who pushed us off in the first place. And they left the new Congress facing a debt chasm, a sequestration void and a government-stoppage bottomless pit.
So, yeah, this last one was pretty darned bad. The best argument I can make for it is that none of the outgoing members walked onto the floor and brained a colleague with a cane, as did happen in the 34th Congress. Which also was being led by President Franklin Pierce. So I would give the 34th the ribbon. But definitely the 112th is a contender.
The new Congress will have a few more Democrats in the House and Senate, which will not make any difference whatsoever. On the plus side, the proportion of political nut jobs may be a little lower. Representative Allen West of Florida, who once called President Obama “a low-level socialist agitator,†is, many recounts later, a member no more. Representative Joe Walsh of Illinois was defeated by Tammy Duckworth, a military veteran who lost both legs in Iraq and who Walsh claimed was not one of “our true heroes.†Walsh was also an excellent reminder of an important rule in American politics: refrain from criticizing the other party for fiscal irresponsibility until you can work out a resolution of that child support issue.
Tea Party favorite Senator Jim DeMint of South Carolina has departed, too, even though his term was only half over, to answer the siren call of a seven-figure job at the helm of the Heritage Foundation.
Thanks to the blog Smart Politics, I am able to report that this is normal behavior in South Carolina: one-third of all U.S. senators from South Carolina have resigned over the course of our history. (South Carolina is also the state that gave us the guy with the cane back in 1856.) DeMint was replaced by Representative Tim Scott, whose seat will be filled in a special election this spring. Right now one of the possible candidates is Mark Sanford, the governor who we all remember for flying to Argentina for an assignation with his lover while his staff claimed he was hiking on the Appalachian Trail.
Another much-discussed potential contender is Jenny Sanford, former wife of the above. People, while you are praying for a safe, sane and peaceful new year, I want you to make a small exception and pray that Jenny and Mark Sanford run against each other.
DeMint’s departure was only unusual for its abruptness. Members of Congress regularly glom onto high-paying jobs in the private sector, none of which involve the use of their skills in computer technology. The Center for Responsive Politics counts 373 former House and Senate members who are currently working as lobbyists.
That includes the former Utah Senator Bob Bennett, who announced that he would be filing his official papers on Thursday, the exact moment the legal two-year revolving door ban expires. Bennett had complained bitterly about the cooling-off period being a restraint of his constitutional rights, which left him forced to eke out a living as a consultant for the BennettGroup and a member of a high-profile Washington law firm.
When it comes to a sudden departure, though, the new titleholder has to be Representative Jo Ann Emerson of Missouri, who quit Congress to become president and chief executive of the National Rural Electric Cooperative Association less than a month after she was re-elected to another term. She said she had found “a new way to serve.†The Center for Responsive Politics noted that the National Rural Electric Cooperative Association was not only a big lobbying group, but also Emerson’s “biggest lifetime campaign contributor.â€
Still, remember, could be worse. No canes.
I’ve seen a few references to this one today.