As you’ve no doubt noticed, I’ve been fiddling about with things around here. It all started when an update to the Jetpack “after the deadline” option caused a Javascript error that kept me from putting up new posts. Before I realized that was the issue, I fiddled about with and somehow broke (or so I thought, anyway) a few other things. Of course, had I just waited a bit I could have saved myself some anxiety, ‘cuz they’ve now fixed Jetpack (assuming you’re reading this right now, anyway – we’ll see what happens when I go to publish).
So, anyhow, the old theme was something I cobbled together back in November of 2005 (I’m rather astounded by the fact that it was over eight years ago), and while I’ve kind of added shit to it over the years, it really doesn’t support a bunch of more modern developments that have been made to WP over the years. So I figured I’d go with something newer, and being too lazy to do it from scratch, I decided to go with an “off the shelf” solution.
This is good, I guess, but there are a bunch of things that no longer are here or that work differently in ways I don’t like, and that I’ll either have to live with or do some more fiddling about (and, no doubt, fucking up).
For one thing, the “more” button no longer loads the comments for that post. You have to actually click on the post title (or the comments link).
I also don’t like that there’s no comment preview under the “recent comments” thingie (and though the Gravatar shows up, which is cool, if you don’t have one it shows a broken image thing, which is not cool). And I need get my retirement countdown back so I can continue to count down the days until I retire (and then probably die, with my luck).
The html tag buttons do not appear to show up in Chrome, either. I’ll have to see what I can do about that. They seem to be OK in Firefox, though. And I found a comment editor thingie that seems to work (it now should show a “modify” link when you submit a comment, which brings up an Ajaxy edit form – though I don’t think that sucker includes an html tag bar, so you’d better either get those right the first time or learn you some html).
I will continue fiddling over the weekend, if I can pull myself away from Need for Speed (haven’t played in two days, and I’m getting a bit anxious).
Some bad news yesterday, as my stepson got laid off from his job. I feel both sad for and a bit envious of him. Not that I want to lose my job, of course. Some real panic and terror would set in mighty quick – I don’t have all that much of a cushion when it comes to paying the bills (not to mention work pays for my Internet, which I clearly can’t live without), and I don’t think my age makes me the ideal candidate that prospective employers are looking for.
I wouldn’t mind some paid time off, though. It’s ironic, because I was looking over my vacation time accruals, and I need to take about 23 days of vacation by the end of this year to keep from losing anything. That’s almost five weeks – and that would only get me back down to the max. Clearly, I don’t take enough time off. I think I’ll make that one of my goals in my next annual evaluation.
I was happy to see that my first name isn’t among the Top 10 Republican names (Tanner is the big winner there – roughly 60% of Tanners are both Republicans and attend religious services weekly, and a minority of Tanners have a college degree though there’s surely no correlation there).
At first I thought these were last names, because I personally don’t know anybody with a first name of Tanner.
You can do a search for your first name here. It’s kind of interesting, in some cases. For instance, ‘Patrick’ is roughly evenly split between Republicans and Democrats (slightly red), while “Pat” is just a tad bit more blue.
So you’d think that people who registered with nicknames (or shortened names, anyway) would lean left. But no, “Sue” is red while “Susan” is blue (and I think we better stick with “Vernon” ‘cuz the Verns out there appear to be good god-fearin’ Republicans.
John, BTW, is the second most common name for registered voters. I figured Mary would be #1, but, no. So what’s the most common name?
Beats me. I haven’t found it yet.
Update: Found it – it’s Michael. Didn’t see that one coming.
It’s still pretty cold around here, but they claim it’s going to get up to 39 today (and tomorrow, too). If that’s the case, I need to dig out my mailbox so I can put the new one I bought up (the door seems to have disappeared, and it kinda fills up with snow).
Speaking of snow, there’s more in store for us next week, they say. Nothing major, I don’t think (but that can change in a hurry). We’ve had just under 115″ so far this year, which is about 9″ above average. For the season we average something like 123″ so I don’t know if that means we only have another eight to go, or we’re gonna get another 20.
Or more. I should be heartened byt the fact that it’s March and “spring” is less than two weeks away (plus Daylight Saving Time this weekend! That means more daylight after work, which for me justifies the loss of two hours of my weekend – one hour springing ahead, and another hour spent changing all the goddamn clocks). But we’ve had some nasty snow storms around here in March (and April, even – hell, we had eight inches of snow on Mother’s Day one year).
March 1993 comes to mind. We got something like 43″ of snow over one weekend – three feet of it in a 24 hour period. And it was wet, heavy snow (I remember every shovelful – good thing I was still young back then).
Let’s hope we don’t get another one of those this year.
Oh well, time to get this week over.
Looks like we might want to roll with PJ as well.
Repairs are looking good, Blogfather. I still have to put embeds in a second time to make them appear but the postman almost always rings twice. Actually, the embed no longer works for me at all, even the repost. All that happens is it says my post has been updated. Now the embed appears but has size issues. Since it appears to be coming from the link and not the embed code, I can’t monkey with the numbers to make it fit all nicey. Editing is still funky.
I need to switch off the MSNBC stream for a few days. I can tolerate some of the CPAC speeches the first time but replaying the ‘highlights’ over and over is getting to me. I realize I have a backlog of Stewarts and Colberts to catch up with so away we go.
Seemed to work OK for me.
When I used the embed code, it didn’t take even after a repost. It showed up when I used the link but I can’t resize the link. However, I can edit replies now but it is hinky like the other edit function.
http://youtu.be/4qM4hszTEUo
Hmm. Interesting. I used the regular embed code on mine and it was fine.
Using Firefox right now.
OK, let’s see. Trying this in FF with a “regular” user account.
[youtube http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MZ4sK-Q42AU&w=450&h=338%5D
Well, I used the following URL for the above (leaving off the “youtube.com” part so it doesn’t get turned into a video).
/watch?v=MZ4sK-Q42AU&w=450&h=338
Not sure where you got that. I cut and pasted the embed code from YouTube. It and the link look nothing like that.
Well, I kinda cobbled it together from the embed code.
The embed code has:
/embed/MZ4sK-Q42AU
So the video (v) is MZ4sK-Q42AU
So after the youtube dot com, it’s
?v=MZ4sK-Q42AU (the ? just starts what’s called a querystring. You can add additional values to the querystring by using “&”in between each one.
So if I want a width of 450 pixels, I add that to the querystring as w=450 and a height of 338 as h=338
So the full querystring looks like
?v=MZ4sK-Q42AU&w=450&h=338
And then before the querystring, you have to use “watch.”
So it’s
youtube(dot)com/watch?v=MZ4sK-Q42AU&w=450&h=338
Simple, no?
No.
I’ll try and look at it over the weekend. If you get a chance, try Chrome or Safari or even (heaven forbid) IE and see if any of them are different. Be nice to know if it’s FF or the user account level (or both!).
Let me try a picture. Let’s try a second time.
Let me try a picture.
No such luck.
I’ll try just the link.
https://scontent-a-sjc.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-frc3/l/t1/1978619_892044337491687_1537687357_n.jpg
Oh, well.
Beats me. More work for the weekend.
Good way to drive up the comment numbers, though.
If you got edit/update credits, it would be just like the olden days.
[youtube http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MZ4sK-Q42AU&w=450&h=338%5D
Appears to be the user level, I guess. Must be some kind of setting someplace.
Maybe I am in an ‘abuser’ level. 😉
Try again
So, something went terribly wrong with the last theme – apparently all on its own, ‘cuz I didn’t do anything. I don’t think.
That’s the last I’ll mess with this thing today.
[youtube http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9UOweeSdI2k&w=560&h=315%5D
I woke up this morning to the terribly sad news that Terry Coppage, otherwise known as “Bartcop”
has died.
http://www.bartcop.com/ :gate: 🙁
His was the first website I saved as a favorite and supported on and off (mostly off) since the end of the 20th century.
He was just your regular political internet blogger with a bit of an anger problem regarding hypocrisy, religion, con men (and women) and had a particular distaste for Rush Limbaugh who he described as “a lying Nazi whore”. He was my anger management therapy all these years by providing humor (mostly black) and perspective from “KDrag” (for knuckle drag) Oklahoma.
He battled cancer and floods over the last few years and left way too early at the age of 60.
He deserved another poker trip to Las Vegas, another shot of his favorite Anejo tequila and one more toke of some find Colorado bud.
He also left his loving retired school teacher wife with a mortgage.
Please visit the website to get a taste of his legacy
and maybe contribute something for his widow.
I’m sure Mike Malloy and some others in the alternate media will be posting tributes.
Too Soon
Some more on BartCop because he earned it. I only caught him in passing and didn’t know a lot about him. I always enjoyed him. I didn’t know he was an Okie.
Bartcop
Celebrating the life of Terry Coppage
🙁 :gate:
http://youtu.be/s-T00yYFW6M
Sheila MacRae, Wife in ’60s ‘Honeymooners’ Sketches, Dies at 92
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/03/09/arts/television/sheila-macrae-wife-in-60s-honeymooners-sketches-dies-at-92.html
🙁
Sheila MacRae, Wife in ’60s ‘Honeymooners’ Sketches, Dies at 92
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/03/09/arts/television/sheila-macrae-wife-in-60s-honeymooners-sketches-dies-at-92.html
http://youtu.be/ELCj5TOrH5M
🙁
You know what they say about unchanged clocks: they are right about half the year.
Test